Comments for Antwerkz, Inc. http://antwerkz.com Fri, 30 Sep 2011 22:40:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= Comment on So Long and Thanks for All the GlassFish by Arun Gupta http://antwerkz.com/so-long-and-thanks-for-all-the-glassfish/#comment-259 Arun Gupta Fri, 30 Sep 2011 22:40:59 +0000 http://antwerkz.com/?p=4762#comment-259 Hey Justin, Good luck in your future endeavors! Cheers, -Arun Hey Justin,

Good luck in your future endeavors!

Cheers,
-Arun

]]> Comment on Port Unification in GlassFish 3 – Part 4 by admin http://antwerkz.com/port-unification-in-glassfish-3-%e2%80%93-part-4/#comment-137 admin Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:25:21 +0000 http://antwerkz.com/?p=4660#comment-137 There are (speculative) plans to unify all the protocols but it's a matter of resources and timing at this point. If you're a paid support customer you could certainly file a request through your support contact for it. That would help us prioritize a bit better. But even if you aren't, please file one in the tracker and let the project managers let know it's a priority. There are (speculative) plans to unify all the protocols but it’s a matter of resources and timing at this point. If you’re a paid support customer you could certainly file a request through your support contact for it. That would help us prioritize a bit better. But even if you aren’t, please file one in the tracker and let the project managers let know it’s a priority.

]]> Comment on Port Unification in GlassFish 3 – Part 4 by Jörg Thönnes http://antwerkz.com/port-unification-in-glassfish-3-%e2%80%93-part-4/#comment-136 Jörg Thönnes Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:19:32 +0000 http://antwerkz.com/?p=4660#comment-136 Great article series! I know about PU for a while and think this is a very important concept if you have firewalls and want to reduce the administrative overhead for new customers going through the firewall. Our JavaWS based client uses HTTP, IIOP and OpenMQ to connect to the Glassfish server. Of course we would like to use exactly one port for these protocols, but I wonder how I could accomplish this. Are there any plans to implement the relevant helper classers for Glassfish? How could we push this forward, e.g. using a service contract? Thanks, Jörg Great article series! I know about PU for a while and think this is a very important concept if you have firewalls and want to reduce the administrative overhead for new customers going through the firewall.

Our JavaWS based client uses HTTP, IIOP and OpenMQ to connect to the Glassfish server. Of course we would like to use exactly one port for these protocols, but I wonder how I could accomplish this.

Are there any plans to implement the relevant helper classers for Glassfish? How could we push this forward, e.g. using a service contract?

Thanks, Jörg

]]> Comment on Port Unification in GlassFish 3 – Part 1 by jlee http://antwerkz.com/port-unification-in-glassfish-3-part-1/#comment-113 jlee Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:18:23 +0000 http://www.antwerkz.com/?p=4579#comment-113 This functionality is actually in 3.0. The only difference is that the asadmin commands are not. So probably the simplest route would be to download a nightly build of 3.1, run these commands, and then transplant the appropriate pieces of the xml into your 3.0 domain.xml. This functionality is actually in 3.0. The only difference is that the asadmin commands are not. So probably the simplest route would be to download a nightly build of 3.1, run these commands, and then transplant the appropriate pieces of the xml into your 3.0 domain.xml.

]]> Comment on Port Unification in GlassFish 3 – Part 1 by Rick S http://antwerkz.com/port-unification-in-glassfish-3-part-1/#comment-112 Rick S Thu, 24 Jun 2010 04:26:03 +0000 http://www.antwerkz.com/?p=4579#comment-112 Can you point me in the right direction on how to get Glassfish 3.0 to do a redirect of http to https? Can you point me in the right direction on how to get Glassfish 3.0 to do a redirect of http to https?

]]> Comment on Apache, Oracle, and the JCK by jlee http://antwerkz.com/apache-oracle-and-the-jck/#comment-116 jlee Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:20:36 +0000 http://www.antwerkz.com/?p=4616#comment-116 I haven't heard anything in a while either. The closest thing I've seen to an ME app store would be the mini one that my phone carrier has for the not so smart phone I use. :) I haven’t heard anything in a while either. The closest thing I’ve seen to an ME app store would be the mini one that my phone carrier has for the not so smart phone I use. :)

]]> Comment on Apache, Oracle, and the JCK by Frank Cohen http://antwerkz.com/apache-oracle-and-the-jck/#comment-115 Frank Cohen Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:03:04 +0000 http://www.antwerkz.com/?p=4616#comment-115 It's been a while since anyone at Sun briefed me on the ME marketplace. All I see on TV is ads for iPhone and Android (and many more Android ones at that.) How many handsets run ME? What organizations are making money on ME apps? Is there an ME appstore? It’s been a while since anyone at Sun briefed me on the ME marketplace. All I see on TV is ads for iPhone and Android (and many more Android ones at that.) How many handsets run ME? What organizations are making money on ME apps? Is there an ME appstore?

]]> Comment on Apache, Oracle, and the JCK by Yves Martin http://antwerkz.com/apache-oracle-and-the-jck/#comment-114 Yves Martin Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:39:54 +0000 http://www.antwerkz.com/?p=4616#comment-114 I really agree with you. For me, JavaME specifications are great especially concerning security aspects, without lack of features (2d, 3d, positioning...). Just look at JBenchmark tests ! I'm disappointed too that Apple and Google does not support it probably because of royalities. Even non-symbian Nokia like my N900 does not have JavaME included. As a service provider, that is a non comfortable situation: an application for mobile must be written and tested for JavaME, iPhone (ObjectiveC), Android (Java like)... and maybe others like MeeGo (C++ Qt), Bada and publish on there respective "stores". Just head-ackes and costs !! I really agree with you. For me, JavaME specifications are great especially concerning security aspects, without lack of features (2d, 3d, positioning…). Just look at JBenchmark tests !
I’m disappointed too that Apple and Google does not support it probably because of royalities. Even non-symbian Nokia like my N900 does not have JavaME included.
As a service provider, that is a non comfortable situation: an application for mobile must be written and tested for JavaME, iPhone (ObjectiveC), Android (Java like)… and maybe others like MeeGo (C++ Qt), Bada and publish on there respective “stores”. Just head-ackes and costs !!

]]> Comment on GlassFish Web Sockets Sample by jlee http://antwerkz.com/glassfish-web-sockets-sample/#comment-106 jlee Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:48:29 +0000 http://www.antwerkz.com/?p=4528#comment-106 The grizzly dev or users mailing list is the best place: https://grizzly.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectMailingListList The grizzly dev or users mailing list is the best place: https://grizzly.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectMailingListList

]]> Comment on GlassFish Web Sockets Sample by jlee http://antwerkz.com/glassfish-web-sockets-sample/#comment-105 jlee Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:43:29 +0000 http://www.antwerkz.com/?p=4528#comment-105 Wow. I have not seen that one. It worked fine on Chrome on OS X last I tried it. I'll see if I get the same response here. I wonder if it's related to the WebSockets protocol rev. The new version is incompatible with the version I based the grizzly code on. Seems unlikely at this stage but you never know... Wow. I have not seen that one. It worked fine on Chrome on OS X last I tried it. I’ll see if I get the same response here. I wonder if it’s related to the WebSockets protocol rev. The new version is incompatible with the version I based the grizzly code on. Seems unlikely at this stage but you never know…

]]>