<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grizzly and WebSockets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antwerkz.com/grizzly-and-websockets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antwerkz.com/grizzly-and-websockets/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:18:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlee</title>
		<link>http://antwerkz.com/grizzly-and-websockets/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>jlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antwerkz.com/?p=4297#comment-86</guid>
		<description>With glassfish and grizzly, you can actually write a ProtocolFilter to implement a new protocol.  That&#039;s not portable across appservers, of course, but is one option.  It&#039;s funny that you should mention the protocol bit, though, because I&#039;m hoping to write a websockets/JMX tunnel in the next few weeks as the API settles down and as I have time between my glassfish/grizzly duties.  I&#039;m not sure how feasible it would be to write such a beast but I&#039;m going to try and see.  Who knows?  It might actually work.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With glassfish and grizzly, you can actually write a ProtocolFilter to implement a new protocol.  That&#8217;s not portable across appservers, of course, but is one option.  It&#8217;s funny that you should mention the protocol bit, though, because I&#8217;m hoping to write a websockets/JMX tunnel in the next few weeks as the API settles down and as I have time between my glassfish/grizzly duties.  I&#8217;m not sure how feasible it would be to write such a beast but I&#8217;m going to try and see.  Who knows?  It might actually work.  <img src='http://antwerkz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcahornsirup</title>
		<link>http://antwerkz.com/grizzly-and-websockets/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>mcahornsirup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antwerkz.com/?p=4297#comment-85</guid>
		<description>I just stumbled over your site ... WebSockets would force Appserver vendors to make it easier to support more protocols. Currently, there are only two two common ways of integrating &quot;third party protocols&quot; or a custom one - JCA and the introduction of an ESB. While there are not much open and free JCA implementations/documentation out there for the latest version 1.6 of, there are a few more binding components... nevertheless, sometimes, you just want an easy way of integration and not spending a few days by reading the JSRs... WebSockets, maybe the next big thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just stumbled over your site &#8230; WebSockets would force Appserver vendors to make it easier to support more protocols. Currently, there are only two two common ways of integrating &#8220;third party protocols&#8221; or a custom one &#8211; JCA and the introduction of an ESB. While there are not much open and free JCA implementations/documentation out there for the latest version 1.6 of, there are a few more binding components&#8230; nevertheless, sometimes, you just want an easy way of integration and not spending a few days by reading the JSRs&#8230; WebSockets, maybe the next big thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
