Comments on: Introducing Qwicket http://antwerkz.com/introducing-qwicket/ Fri, 30 Sep 2011 22:40:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: chuck http://antwerkz.com/introducing-qwicket/#comment-22 chuck Wed, 09 Aug 2006 01:44:35 +0000 http://www.antwerkz.com/wp/?p=1006#comment-22 Typical maven project -- broken. One of the draws of Wicket is that it doesn't itself use maven. I know pretty much how to fix these errors, but I already DID for half of them (javamail, ejb3) at least twice, and I am *sick and tired* of continually jumping through the hoops of a mavenized project. BUILD FAILED /home/chuck/dl/unpack/qwicket/build.xml:22: Unable to resolve artifact: required artifacts missing: javax.persistence:ejb:jar:3.0-public-draft-20060327 wicket:wicket:jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT org.hibernate:hibernate:jar:3.2.0cr1 wicket:wicket-extensions:jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.3 wicket:wicket-spring-annot:jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT wicket:wicket-spring:jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT Typical maven project — broken. One of the draws of Wicket is that it doesn’t itself use maven.

I know pretty much how to fix these errors, but I already DID for half of them (javamail, ejb3) at least twice, and I am *sick and tired* of continually jumping through the hoops of a mavenized project.

BUILD FAILED
/home/chuck/dl/unpack/qwicket/build.xml:22: Unable to resolve artifact: required artifacts missing:
javax.persistence:ejb:jar:3.0-public-draft-20060327
wicket:wicket:jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT
org.hibernate:hibernate:jar:3.2.0cr1
wicket:wicket-extensions:jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT
javax.mail:mail:jar:1.3.3
wicket:wicket-spring-annot:jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT
wicket:wicket-spring:jar:1.2-SNAPSHOT

]]> By: jlee http://antwerkz.com/introducing-qwicket/#comment-21 jlee Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:20:26 +0000 http://www.antwerkz.com/wp/?p=1006#comment-21 Supporting both versions could be tricky. Once we see what migration issues there are with 2.0 perhaps a more intelligent decision can be made in that regard. If it's too complicated, though, I don't have much desire to try to support that. We'll have to see though. Changes like the constructor change are pretty significant. Here's the list so far: http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Migrate-2.0. Supporting both versions could be tricky. Once we see what migration issues there are with 2.0 perhaps a more intelligent decision can be made in that regard. If it’s too complicated, though, I don’t have much desire to try to support that. We’ll have to see though. Changes like the constructor change are pretty significant. Here’s the list so far: http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Migrate-2.0.

]]> By: JavaGeek http://antwerkz.com/introducing-qwicket/#comment-20 JavaGeek Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:11:09 +0000 http://www.antwerkz.com/wp/?p=1006#comment-20 Why flip the switch? Even though some people might want to switch to 2.0 once it's out, I'm sure that a lot of people would rather be able to start a new project using the more stable 1.2 version. I would, instead of a switch, add a drop-down so you could select which version of wicket you want to use. Why flip the switch? Even though some people might want to switch to 2.0 once it’s out, I’m sure that a lot of people would rather be able to start a new project using the more stable 1.2 version. I would, instead of a switch, add a drop-down so you could select which version of wicket you want to use.

]]> By: jlee http://antwerkz.com/introducing-qwicket/#comment-19 jlee Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:18:19 +0000 http://www.antwerkz.com/wp/?p=1006#comment-19 Correct. Qwicket will support 2.0 as soon as it's released but for now practicality says we stick with 1.2. When 2.0 gets closer, I'll start integrating it ahead of release so that hopefully as soon as Wicket 2.0 ships, we can flip the switch and start using it. Correct. Qwicket will support 2.0 as soon as it’s released but for now practicality says we stick with 1.2. When 2.0 gets closer, I’ll start integrating it ahead of release so that hopefully as soon as Wicket 2.0 ships, we can flip the switch and start using it.

]]> By: Eelco http://antwerkz.com/introducing-qwicket/#comment-18 Eelco Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:34:05 +0000 http://www.antwerkz.com/wp/?p=1006#comment-18 Kudos! Is this for Wicket 1.2? Kudos! Is this for Wicket 1.2?

]]> By: Martijn Dashorst http://antwerkz.com/introducing-qwicket/#comment-17 Martijn Dashorst Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:15:19 +0000 http://www.antwerkz.com/wp/?p=1006#comment-17 Justin, can you update the link the the Wicket home page to: http://wicketframework.org ? We will be moving our project website to that URL and host it on another server in the near future. Congrats on the QWicket project! Martijn Justin, can you update the link the the Wicket home page to: http://wicketframework.org ?

We will be moving our project website to that URL and host it on another server in the near future.

Congrats on the QWicket project!

Martijn

]]>