<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Antwerkz, Inc. &#187; development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antwerkz.com/tag/development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antwerkz.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:05:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Deprecation in the JDK</title>
		<link>http://antwerkz.com/re-deprecation-in-the-jdk/</link>
		<comments>http://antwerkz.com/re-deprecation-in-the-jdk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 21:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antwerkz.com/?p=3289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone hates the deprecation policies of the JDK team but it's certainly an understandable policy.  Millions and millions of lines of code exist out in the wild and there's no telling what calamity would befall us if methods were actually removed the JRE libs.  On the other hand, people still use those deprecated methods despite [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://antwerkz.com/re-deprecation-in-the-jdk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>String Concatenation Revisited</title>
		<link>http://antwerkz.com/string-concatenation-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://antwerkz.com/string-concatenation-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justin lee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antwerkz.com/?p=1759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had intended to do some follow up numbers to my previous post but I got a bit sidetracked by work and the like.  My simple tests all work with one String that's created then thrown away.  This test helped me resolve the question I had when I started down that road but stops short [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://antwerkz.com/string-concatenation-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[Tips]]></series:name>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>String Concatenation Options</title>
		<link>http://antwerkz.com/string-concatenation-options/</link>
		<comments>http://antwerkz.com/string-concatenation-options/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justin lee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antwerkz.com/?p=1505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's a new inspection in IDEA 8 (might just be in the EAP at this point) that will convert string concatentation to a variety of different approaches.  One of these options is to use String.format().  I started applying this option to some code I'm working because it's certainly more readable than some of the concatenation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://antwerkz.com/string-concatenation-options/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[Tips]]></series:name>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

